[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC][v8][PATCH 9/10]: Define clone3() syscall
    On 10/22/2009 09:14 PM, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
    > So, sometimes, a number in a system call should be the bit width of
    > some arguments(s), sometimes it should be the number of arguments, and
    > sometimes (well, just occasionally, as in mmap2() and clone()) -- it
    > should be a version number? Does the weather play any part in the
    > decision? ;-)

    The notion is that they are *some* kind of description on how the system
    call has been augmented. The bitwidths and argument numbers are
    non-overlapping and visually very different, so are not subject to
    confusion. Your argument makes about as much sense as saying the letter
    "a" should have the same meaning in every context.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-10-22 14:29    [W:0.034 / U:18.900 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site