Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC][v8][PATCH 0/10] Implement clone3() system call | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Date | Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:11:49 -0700 |
| |
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman [ebiederm@xmission.com] wrote: > | Not what I was thinking. The following untested patch is what I was > | thinking. It just exposes last, min, and max to the callers which pass > | in different appropriate values. > > > Minor comments are that the caller has to choose which function to call > and passing in 'target-1' for the 'last' in set_pidmap() seems a bit > unnatural. But I can't think of a better way and I think this will work. > Will test it out.
Thanks. My primary concern was that we don't unnecessarily duplicate all of the weird allocating a bitmap page code etc.
| |