lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.32-rc1-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.31
Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> If you add one more entry say "Suspected commit :" then it will be great
> and will solve regressions much faster.

Will? Might.

> You can request submitter to
> submit 'suspected commit' by git bisect and also specify git bisect
> links like : (for more information about git bisect check
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/11753)

I disagree. A reporter should only be asked to bisect (using git or
other tools) /if/ a developer determined that bisection may speed up the
debugging process or is the only remaining option to make progress with
a bug.

It would be wrong to steal a reporter's valuable time by asking for
bisection before anybody familiar with the matter even had a first look
at the report.

Remember:
- Not all bugs can be economically narrowed down by bisection.
- Bisection requires skills, rigor, and time.
- Alas there are considerable sections in our kernel history which
are not bisectable.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--= =-=- ---=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-02 15:05    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans