Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:55:15 -0700 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for October 14 |
| |
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:34:45 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Changes since 20091013: > > Undropped tree: i7core_edac > > My fixes tree contains a build fix for powerpc/kvm. > > The pci tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree. > > The kbuild tree gained a build failure that required me to remove > include/asm/asm-offsets.h from my object tree. > > The net tree lost its build failure. > > The percpu tree lost its build failure. > > The tty tree still had a build failure for which I reverted a commit. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have created today's linux-next tree at > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git > (patches at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/next/ ). If you > are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull" > to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the > old one. You should use "git fetch" as mentioned in the FAQ on the wiki > (see below).
Hi Stephen,
Where are today's .bz2 file and the .sign files?
and when did pub/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/ disappear?
The kernel.org/kdist/finger_banner file now reports: The latest linux-next version of the Linux kernel is: next-20091013
instead of 20091014.
--- ~Randy
| |