Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: tbench regression with 2.6.32-rc1 | From | "Zhang, Yanmin" <> | Date | Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:20:29 +0800 |
| |
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 12:16 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 17:51 +0800, Zhang, Yanmin wrote: > > Comparing with 2.6.31's results, tebench has some regression with > > 2.6.32-rc1. > > COmmandline to start tbench: > > #./tbench_srv & > > #./tbench -t 600 CPU_NUM*2 127.0.0.1 #Use real cpu num to replace CPU_NUM > > So start 2 client processes per cpu. > > > > 1) On 4*4 core tigerton: 30%; > > 2) On 2*4 core stoakley: 15%; > > 3) On 2*8 core Nehalem: 6%. > > > > As there are couple of patches which try to turn on/off some sched domain > > flags such like SD_BALANCE_WAKE, I used some walkaround to bisect it. > > On tigerton, below patch is captured. > > commit 59abf02644c45f1591e1374ee7bb45dc757fcb88 > > Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > > Date: Wed Sep 16 08:28:30 2009 +0200 > > > > sched: Add SD_PREFER_LOCAL > > > > > > The patch reverting is not clean, so I did some testing by turning on/off > > some domain flags and sched_feaures manually. > > > > 1) On tigerton: if SD_PREFER_LOCAL=0 (disable it), the regression becomes about 2%. > > 2) On stoakley: if SD_PREFER_LOCAL=0 (disable it), the regression becomes about 4%. > > 3) On Nehalem: Above method couldn't improve result. I'm still checking it. > > > > I also tried to turn on/off FAIR_SLEEPERS and GENTLE_FAIR_SLEEPERS. It seems they > > has limited impact on tbench. I need double check these 2 flags. > > So the c2q cpus, and esp the one with smaller cache hurt from this. I > guess we can turn this off without too much down sides. Maybe turn it on > for NUMA on the nehalem? I tested the patch and it does work like turning it off from domain flags. So with the patch, stoakley still has 4% regression and tigerton has 2%.
> > > --- > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h > index 25a9284..d823c24 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/topology.h > @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ extern unsigned long node_remap_size[]; > | 1*SD_BALANCE_FORK \ > | 0*SD_BALANCE_WAKE \ > | 1*SD_WAKE_AFFINE \ > + | 1*SD_PREFER_LOCAL \ > | 0*SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER \ > | 0*SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE \ > | 0*SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES \ > diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h > index fc0bf3e..57e6357 100644 > --- a/include/linux/topology.h > +++ b/include/linux/topology.h > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void); > | 1*SD_BALANCE_FORK \ > | 0*SD_BALANCE_WAKE \ > | 1*SD_WAKE_AFFINE \ > - | 1*SD_PREFER_LOCAL \ > + | 0*SD_PREFER_LOCAL \ > | 0*SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER \ > | 1*SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES \ > | 0*SD_SERIALIZE \ > @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void); > | 1*SD_BALANCE_FORK \ > | 0*SD_BALANCE_WAKE \ > | 1*SD_WAKE_AFFINE \ > - | 1*SD_PREFER_LOCAL \ > + | 0*SD_PREFER_LOCAL \ > | 0*SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER \ > | 0*SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES \ > | 0*SD_SERIALIZE \ > >
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |