lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRE: [patch 37/37] sit: fix off-by-one in ipip6_tunnel_get_prl
David,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@davemloft.net]
> Sent: Friday, October 09, 2009 8:43 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: gregkh@suse.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@kernel.org; stable-review@kernel.org;
> torvalds@linux-foundation.org; akpm@linux-foundation.org; alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk;
> contact@saschahlusiak.de; yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
> Subject: Re: [patch 37/37] sit: fix off-by-one in ipip6_tunnel_get_prl
>
> From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:34:49 -0700
>
> > Wait a moment - I remember now that this code came
> > from Yoshifuji, and I believe there was a reason for
> > the cmax+1. The application is expected to know this
> > and to post a large enough buffer.
> >
> > Can we put this on hold until I have had a chance to
> > check my e-mail archives and my local iproute changes
> > (will respond on monday)?
>
> Sure, we can keep it out of -stable for now.
>
> But it is in Linus's tree so if you find we shouldn't do this
> you'll need to send me a revert for net-2.6
>
> Otherwise if it's good, you'll have to remind me to resubmit
> it to -stable.

I just got done testing with the patch applied to my kernel,
and the patch is good. Please submit to -stable if you have
not already done so.

Update - this may be overcome by the message I just rec'd
from Greg KH. I will go look at his message now.

Thanks - Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

> Thanks!


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-10-13 01:25    [W:0.104 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site