[lkml]   [2009]   [Oct]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86 UV: Fixes for UV rtc timers

    * Dimitri Sivanich <> wrote:

    > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 06:23:17PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > > hm, why is the (unnecessary seeming) pushing of the
    > > ack/exit_idle()/irq_enter()/irq_exit() sequence into the
    > > generic_interrupt_extension() function a cleanup?
    > It seems to make more sense to allow the users of generic_interrupt to
    > provide their own sequence, rather than being forced into this one.

    An IRQ handler is an irq handler. We should make it _more_ generic, not
    less generic.

    Also, the generic_interrupt_extension() name sucks a bit. Something like
    x86_platform_ipi_callback() would be better.

    > > Also, the commit log is rather terse - what is being fixed and why isnt
    > > it separate from any cleanups?
    > I have added to the commit log. See below.

    Please separate out the fix and do the cleanups on top of that.



     \ /
      Last update: 2009-10-12 20:11    [W:0.023 / U:0.084 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site