Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:59:43 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans |
| |
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:54:31 -0500 Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 06:25:04PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:15:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-tag-70-packets.patch > > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-header-updates.patch > > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-encoding-and-encryption-functions.patch > > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-filldir-lookup-and-readlink.patch > > > > > ecryptfs-filename-encryption-mount-option.patch > > > > > ecryptfs-replace-%z-with-%z.patch > > > > > ecryptfs-fix-data-types-int-size_t.patch > > > > > ecryptfs-kerneldoc-for-ecryptfs_parse_tag_70_packet.patch > > > > > ecryptfs-clean-up-ecryptfs_decode_from_filename.patch > > > > > fs-ecryptfs-inodec-cleanup-kerneldoc.patch > > > > > > > > By using lookup_one_len on an arbitrary underlying filesystem this > > > > breaks the assumption that a nameidata is always available. Please > > > > redo to use proper lookup helpers. > > > > > > It that a nack, or do we think we can address this in the next week or > > > three? > > > > Together we the state of the rest of that code that's a NACK, yes :) > > Umm, why did you you just push this in anyway without comment?
I'd sent them before you sent your comments. I didn't think I had done that, so I didn't mention it earlier.
| |