lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 6 Jan 2009 18:24:39 -0500
FromChristoph Hellwig <>
SubjectRe: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:13:44PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> (cc added)
> 
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:57:44 -0500
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:43:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > softirq-introduce-statistics-for-softirq.patch
> > > proc-export-statistics-for-softirq-to-proc.patch
> > > proc-update-document-for-proc-softirqs-and-proc-stat.patch
> > 
> > Why is this in procfs?
> 
> softirq stuff in /proc seems appropriate?  It's alongside
> /proc/interrupts.  We could put it in /trendy-fs-of-the-day, but what
> would it gain us?

debugfs seems to be the normal thing for these.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-07 00:27    [from the cache]
©2003-2008