Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:19:58 -0500 | | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | | Subject | Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans | |
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:17:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure we already had a version better than that in your
> > tree on the list. But I've lost track and we should just restart
> > the review cycle on -fsdevel.> > Yeah, I have the three hfs patches:> > hfsplus-identify-journal-info-block-in-volume-header.patch
> hfsplus-fix-journal-detection.patch> hfs-add-basic-export-support.patch> > in a holding pattern awaiting a second round, due to laggy, incomplete
> and confusing noises from various people. It all needs a revisit.
The first two are not for me to decide. They look fine code-wise,
but IIRC Roman had some issues with wether the condition should be
possible at all.
The third one is where I requested a respin, and I'm pretty sure I've
seen a version with some improvement over the one in your tree. Let's
get the latests version back on -fsdevel and review it again.
The one in your tree certainly is not ready.
|  |