| Date | Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:19:58 -0500 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans |
| |
On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:17:47PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I'm pretty sure we already had a version better than that in your > > tree on the list. But I've lost track and we should just restart > > the review cycle on -fsdevel. > > Yeah, I have the three hfs patches: > > hfsplus-identify-journal-info-block-in-volume-header.patch > hfsplus-fix-journal-detection.patch > hfs-add-basic-export-support.patch > > in a holding pattern awaiting a second round, due to laggy, incomplete > and confusing noises from various people. It all needs a revisit.
The first two are not for me to decide. They look fine code-wise, but IIRC Roman had some issues with wether the condition should be possible at all.
The third one is where I requested a respin, and I'm pretty sure I've seen a version with some improvement over the one in your tree. Let's get the latests version back on -fsdevel and review it again.
The one in your tree certainly is not ready.
|