[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Btrfs for mainline
On Saturday 03 January 2009 06:38:07 Chris Mason wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 01:37 +0900, Ryusuke Konishi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:19:09 -0500, Chris Mason <>
> > > This has only btrfs as a module and would be the fastest way to see
> > > the .c files. btrfs doesn't have any changes outside of fs/Makefile
> > > and fs/Kconfig
> [ ... ]
> > In addition, there seem to be well-separated reusable routines such as
> > async-thread (enhanced workqueue) and extent_map. Do you intend to
> > move these into lib/ or so?
> Sorry, looks like I hit send too soon that time. The async-thread code
> is very self contained, and was intended for generic use. Pushing that
> into lib is probably a good idea.
> The extent_map and extent_buffer code was also intended for generic use.
> It needs some love and care (making it work for blocksize != pagesize)
> before I'd suggest moving it out of fs/btrfs.

I'm yet to be convinced it is a good idea to use extents for this. Been a
long time since we visited the issue, but when you converted ext2 to use
the extent mapping stuff, it actually went slower, and complexity went up
a lot (IIRC possibly required allocations in the writeback path).

So I think it is a fine idea to live in btrfs until it is more proven and
found useful elsewhere.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-05 11:35    [W:0.312 / U:0.012 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site