lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 4 Jan 2009 17:58:30 -0800
FromArjan van de Ven <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] fastboot: make ACPI bus drivers probe asynchronous
On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:03:12 +0800
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 2009-01-04 at 09:31 -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > From 20af3efd07b775a27a997e3df1039e20ea18f62b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > 2001 From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 05:32:28 -0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] fastboot: make ACPI bus drivers probe asynchronous
> > 
> > the various ACPI bus drivers have non-overlapping devices and can
> > each be run asynchronous. Some of the ACPI drivers (especially the
> > battery one, but others as well) can take quite a long time to
> > probe.
> It seems that all the ACPI drivers are registered asynchronously after
> this change. 

they are registered asynchronously compared to the rest of the kernel,
but in strict original sequence compared to eachother.


> > +static void acpi_bus_register_async(void *data, async_cookie_t
> > cookie) +{
> > +	int ret;
> > +	struct acpi_driver *driver = data;
> > +	driver->drv.name = driver->name;
> > +	driver->drv.bus = &acpi_bus_type;
> > +	driver->drv.owner = driver->owner;
> > +
> > +	async_synchronize_cookie(cookie);
> > +
> > +	ret = driver_register(&driver->drv);
> > +	WARN_ON(ret != 0);
> > +}

because of the async_synchronize_cookie() call!

-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-05 02:59    [from the cache]
©2003-2008