| Date | Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:10:25 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: document ext3 requirements |
| |
On Sun 2009-01-04 18:35:41, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > [CC: Alan Cox because of his reply in the "XFS internal error" thread] > >> Using ext3 is only safe if storage subsystem meets certain >> criteria. Document those. > > Thanks for this patch. However, after reading this, I have a stupid > question: which file system should I use if I had to reinstall my > computers from scratch now?
ext2 is still the safest default... if you can live with fsck.
ext3 is the safest from the journalling ones, AFAICT. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
|