lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3


On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> ok. The pending regressions are all fixed now, and i've just finished my
> standard tests on the latest tree and all the tests passed fine.

Ok, pulled and pushed out.

Has anybody looked at what the stack size is with MAXSMP set with an
allyesconfig? And what areas are still problematic, if any? Are we going
to have some code-paths that still essentially have 1kB+ of stack space
just because they haven't been converted and still have the cpu mask on
stack?

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-03 21:31    [W:0.060 / U:1.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site