Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:28:38 -0800 (PST) | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Subject | Re: [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3 |
| |
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > ok. The pending regressions are all fixed now, and i've just finished my > standard tests on the latest tree and all the tests passed fine.
Ok, pulled and pushed out.
Has anybody looked at what the stack size is with MAXSMP set with an allyesconfig? And what areas are still problematic, if any? Are we going to have some code-paths that still essentially have 1kB+ of stack space just because they haven't been converted and still have the cpu mask on stack?
Linus
| |