Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PULL] cpumask tree | Date | Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:50:59 +1030 |
| |
On Saturday 03 January 2009 07:08:40 Ingo Molnar wrote: > - architectures that have no __fls (8 out of 21) fail to build: > > arch/cris > arch/frv > arch/h8300 > arch/m32r > arch/m68k > arch/mn10300 > arch/xtensa
Fixes pushed, m68k should be OK tho; is this actual compile test? You have to look in include/asm-m68k to see __fls.
> Rusty, would it be fine with you if we did all the remaining bits via > tip/cpus4096? It's your tree and your bits and we wanted to send our > remaining bits after your tree went to Linus but the conflict resolutions > from Mike are valuable so i think we should reconsider the ordering.
Yeah, no reason for us to do the merge twice. As long as it ends upstream, I'm a happy camper.
Thanks, Rusty.
| |