lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PULL] cpumask tree
Date
On Saturday 03 January 2009 07:08:40 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> - architectures that have no __fls (8 out of 21) fail to build:
>
> arch/cris
> arch/frv
> arch/h8300
> arch/m32r
> arch/m68k
> arch/mn10300
> arch/xtensa

Fixes pushed, m68k should be OK tho; is this actual compile test? You have
to look in include/asm-m68k to see __fls.

> Rusty, would it be fine with you if we did all the remaining bits via
> tip/cpus4096? It's your tree and your bits and we wanted to send our
> remaining bits after your tree went to Linus but the conflict resolutions
> from Mike are valuable so i think we should reconsider the ordering.

Yeah, no reason for us to do the merge twice. As long as it ends upstream,
I'm a happy camper.

Thanks,
Rusty.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-03 08:23    [W:0.750 / U:0.308 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site