Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Jan 2009 04:35:20 +0100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator |
| |
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 09:59:30AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > One thing you might consider is that > Q is visually close enough to O to be > misread. > > Perhaps a different letter would be good.
That's a fair point. Hugh dislikes it too, I see ;) What to do... I had been toying with the idea that if slqb (or slub) becomes "the" allocator, then we could rename it all back to slAb after replacing the existing slab?
Or I could make it a 128 bit allocator and call it SLZB, which would definitely make it "the final" allocator ;)
| |