lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Warning and BUG with btrfs and corrupted image
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> * Dave Chinner (david@fromorbit.com) wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:31:50AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote:
> > > * Pavel Machek (pavel@suse.cz) wrote:
> > > > Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in
> > > > production' and should survive it...
> > >
> > > I regularly (once or twice a week) test 100 corrupted images of
> > > vfat, udf, msdos, swap, iso9660, ext2, ext3, ext4, minix, bfs, befs,
> > > hfs, hfs+, qnx4, affs and cramfs on each of my two test machines.
> >
> > Any reason you are not testing XFS in that set?
>
> So far the responses from xfs folks have been disappointing, if you are
> interested in bugreports i can send you some.

Sure I am. It would be good if you could start testing XFS along
with all the other filesystems and report anything you find.

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-20 14:03    [W:0.092 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site