[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PULL] cpumask tree

    On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Rusty Russell wrote:
    > OK, this is the bulk of the conversion to the new cpumask operators.
    > The x86-specific parts (the most aggressive large-NR_CPUS arch) are going
    > via Ingo's tree.

    This gets lots of conflicts for me. Some of them look simple enough, but
    not all. io_apic.c gets lots of nasty conflicts, and it _looks_ like I
    should just pick the version of the file that I already have (because the
    only thing that comes in from that is yet another merge commit), but
    kernel/sched.c also gets conflicts in areas with FIXME's etc.

    Rusty, Ingo, can you work this out? I pushed out my current tree.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-02 21:09    [W:0.019 / U:94.988 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site