[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/20] return f_fsid for statfs(2)
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 07:36 +0800, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2009 13:28 -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > ext[234] return a portion of the uuid in f_fsid. There is a theoretical
> > chance of those values being non-unique. Since there doesn't appear to
> > be any case for the fsid to be persistent between boots, I guess
> > huge_encode_dev() is probably a better choice. In practice it probably
> > makes no difference.
> I'm not sure what you mean about "no case for fsid to be persistent"?
> The whole point of fsid (for NFS) is that this identifies the filesystem
> over reboot, even if the block device ID changes, or if the filesystem
> doesn't have a block device at all (e.g. cluster filesystem).

I guess that just demonstrates how little I know about what the fsid is
about. Would it be preferable for file systems that have a uuid to use
that instead? Of course anything is an improvement over zeroes.

David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-20 03:41    [W:0.079 / U:1.236 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site