Messages in this thread | | | From | hooanon05@yahoo ... | Subject | Re: [Ecryptfs-devel] [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question | Date | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:25:30 +0900 |
| |
Dave Kleikamp: > > > For a regular file, the size of the upper inode is not the same as the > > > size of the lower inode. The lower inode includes the header blocks > > > which are not visible in the upper inode. So ecryptfs_interpose() will > > > overwrite the correct upper inode size. ::: > It's restoring i_size to the correct value after ecryptfs_interpose > updates it with the wrong value.
Does "ecryptfs_interpose() will overwrite the correct upper inode size" means ecryptfs_interpose() sets a wrong value? If so, I can understand why ecryptfs_link() sets i_size.
J. R. Okajima
| |