Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Ecryptfs-devel] [PATCH] ecryptfs: some inode attrs, and a question | From | Dave Kleikamp <> | Date | Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:01:35 -0600 |
| |
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 11:17 +0900, hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp wrote: > Dave Kleikamp: > > For a regular file, the size of the upper inode is not the same as the > > size of the lower inode. The lower inode includes the header blocks > > which are not visible in the upper inode. So ecryptfs_interpose() will > > overwrite the correct upper inode size. > > Then it means updating i_size in ecryptfs_link() is unnecessary...
It's restoring i_size to the correct value after ecryptfs_interpose updates it with the wrong value.
Shaggy -- David Kleikamp IBM Linux Technology Center
| |