[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.28-rc9: oprofile regression
    > > however, trying to apply this patch to 2.6.28, the behavior is the same
    > > as before (one NMI) ... so possibly, it is a combination of two bugs,
    > > with similar symptoms ...
    > Tim, could you revert 7c64ade53a6f977d73f16243865c42ceae999aea too?
    > If this not helps, last chance is
    > 59512900baab03c5629f2ff5efad1d5d4e682ece, but this seems to be save.

    i tried to revert both commits, however the behavior doesn't seem to
    change. will try to apply the working patch to the child commits, maybe
    i can find something interesting ...

    best, tim

    btw, i am not very familiar with kernel programming, but is it safe to
    have `static u64 *reset_value' uninitialized, or should it be
    initialized to NULL?


    I must say I find television very educational. The minute somebody
    turns it on, I go to the library and read a good book.
    Groucho Marx
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-17 16:13    [W:0.023 / U:1.184 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site