lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 27/85] [PATCH 07/44] [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrapper infrastructure
    Date
    Am Donnerstag 15 Januar 2009 schrieb Jiri Slaby:
    > On 01/15/2009 10:59 PM, Greg KH wrote:
    > > +
    > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_SYSCALL_WRAPPERS
    > > +
    > > +#define SYSCALL_DEFINE(name) static inline long SYSC_##name
    > > +#define SYSCALL_DEFINEx(x, name, ...)
    \
    > > + asmlinkage long sys_##name(__SC_DECL##x(__VA_ARGS__)); \
    > > + static inline long SYSC_##name(__SC_DECL##x(__VA_ARGS__)); \
    >
    > Hmm, we don't support at least gcc 3.4.6 anymore :/. It seems to be the same
    as in:

    I see two possible quick fixes:
    -funit-at-a-time will allow these inline constructs (tested with 3.4.6 on i386
    with enabled syscall wrappers. x86_64 already sets this flag)

    - dont use attribute __always_inline__ for these inlines but the standard
    inline. The question is, how to convince cpp to not replace inline with
    always_inline


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-01-16 09:49    [W:4.212 / U:0.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site