| Date | Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:00:29 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: [patch 42/94] [PATCH 11/44] [CVE-2009-0029] System call wrappers part 01 |
| |
> 2.6.28-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > ------------------ > > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> > > commit 58fd3aa288939d3097fa04505b25c2f5e6e144d1 upstream. > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
That does not make review exactly easy. Would it be possible to inline upstream comment in the commit message?
...upstream commit message is empty :-(.
> -asmlinkage long > -sys_nanosleep(struct timespec __user *rqtp, struct timespec __user *rmtp) > +SYSCALL_DEFINE2(nanosleep, struct timespec __user *, rqtp, > + struct timespec __user *, rmtp) > { > struct timespec tu; >
Is it strictly neccessary to modify all the syscalls?
Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
|