Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:09:11 +0900 | From | Tejun Heo <> | Subject | Re: [patch] add optimized generic percpu accessors |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: >> And this happens to be the third time I wrote the above addresses in >> this thread. :-) > > You know the drill: you have to explicitly ask for stuff to be pulled :-)
Heh... Jeff usually just regenerates patches from the git tree or just takes the mails, so not too familiar with pull requests. :-)
> ( Otherwise if i just pull it and you rebased it or were unhappy about it > in some fashion we all add stress that could have been avoided. ) > > So i've picked up these commits from you: > > d060676: x86_64: misc clean up after the percpu update > 6d459d9: x86_64: convert pda ops to wrappers around x86 percpu accessors > d7051ef: x86_64: make pda a percpu variable > 4fe7fdf: x86_64: merge 64 and 32 SMP percpu handling > 44f5fbd: x86_64: fold pda into percpu area on SMP > cc1d354: x86_64: use static _cpu_pda array > c701268: x86_64: load pointer to pda into %gs while brining up a CPU > 7e36da9: x86_64: make percpu symbols zerobased on SMP > 3fc860d: x86_32: make vmlinux_32.lds.S use PERCPU() macro > bc497c7: x86_64: Cleanup early setup_percpu references > 769d780: x86: make early_per_cpu() a lvalue and use it > 66cbc8e: x86_64: fix pda_to_op() > > into tip/x86/percpu. > > I did the following small reorganizations: > > - i rebased them on top of tip/cpus4096, tip/x86/cleanups and > tip/x86/urgent - that is a stable base. > > - i resolved the conflicts that arose due to recent cpumask and upstream > changes. > > - i standardized the commit logs to the usual x86 style and added > Original-From: Mike Travis tags to those patches that were derived from > Mike's patches. > > If they pass testing they'll be stable commits from that point on, and you > can base your git trees on that topic branch. > > Could you please have a look at the end result? Here are the Git > coordinates for it: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git x86/percpu
Yeap, looks fine to me.
> If we are happy with it then these commits can be stable commits from now > on, and you can base your future changes on this Git tree, and i can pull > updates from you without having to rebase them. > > Does that workflow sound OK to you?
Yes, perfectly okay.
Thanks. :-)
-- tejun
| |