Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:28:31 +0100 (CET) | From | Jiri Kosina <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Remove a duplicated option of RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR |
| |
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > There is a duplicated option of "Check for stalled CPUs delaying RCU > > > grace periods" in Kernel hacking. > Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks.
> > > Signed-off-by: Kaibin Li <kaibinlee@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > lib/Kconfig.debug | 13 ------------- > > > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug > > > index 4c9ae60..e770e85 100644 > > > --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug > > > +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug > > > @@ -633,19 +633,6 @@ config RCU_TORTURE_TEST_RUNNABLE > > > > > > config RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR > > > bool "Check for stalled CPUs delaying RCU grace periods" > > > - depends on CLASSIC_RCU > > > - default n > > > - help > > > - This option causes RCU to printk information on which > > > - CPUs are delaying the current grace period, but only when > > > - the grace period extends for excessive time periods. > > > - > > > - Say Y if you want RCU to perform such checks. > > > - > > > - Say N if you are unsure. > > > - > > > -config RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR > > > - bool "Check for stalled CPUs delaying RCU grace periods" > > > depends on CLASSIC_RCU || TREE_RCU > > > default n > > > help > > > > The RCU_CPU_STALL_DETECTOR indeed is duplicate, but the entries themselves > > are not identical, as they have different dependencies. > > > > Paul -- does Kaibin's patch remove the correct one? If so, I can take it > > through trivial tree. > Indeed it is: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/23/167 ;-) > CCing Ingo in case he has it queued up.
It doesn't seem to be present in today's -next, so I have queued up in trivial tree.
thanks,
-- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
| |