Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:54:04 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Make lttctl mount debugfs automatically |
| |
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 12:16:02AM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Greg KH (gregkh@suse.de) wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 10:30:22PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > > * Zhaolei (zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote: > > > > * From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org> > > > > >* Zhaolei (zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com) wrote: > > > > >> * From: "Pierre-Marc Fournier" <pierre-marc.fournier@polymtl.ca> > > > > >> > Zhaolei wrote: > > > > >> >> lttctl need debugfs mounted, > > > > >> >> This patch make lttctl mount debugfs automatically when it is not mounted. > > > > >> >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Isn't having a utility such as lttctl mount filesystems against standard > > > > >> > unix semantics? Can you give an example of another standard command that > > > > >> > uses a filesystem and that tries to mount it if it isn't already > > > > >> > mounted? > > > > >> Hello, Pierre-Marc, > > > > >> > > > > >> I can give a an example. > > > > >> It is SystemTap. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > No offence, but can you find an example which is not explicitly > > > > > described as "bad taste" example by many people in the Linux kernel > > > > > community ? > > > > Hello, Mathieu > > > > > > > > I can't find another example of mounting debugfs automatically. > > > > Have you looked? openSUSE mounts it automatically, and I think Fedora > > also does so. > > > > It makes sense for a whole distribution to mount debugfs automatically, > but is it OK for a single userspace application to have this kind of > behavior ?
If it's a "debug" application, why not?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |