Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Linux killed Kenny, bastard! | From | Valdis.Kletnieks@vt ... | Date | Tue, 13 Jan 2009 23:23:57 -0500 |
| |
On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 02:35:02 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov said:
> It is exactly the purpose of the patch: to kill what is requested to be > killed. > > I wonder how do you expect users to guess via libastral that even > adjusted score does not work, since it happens that task is so special, > that it can not be killed :)
What does your patch do if one user has a process 'foo' that they're willing to have die first, and a process 'bar' that absolutely can't be killed..
Meanwhile, another user has a 'must die first' process 'bar', and a 'must not die' process 'foo'.
Methinks your patch needs libastral as well? [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |