[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] NFS regression in 2.6.26?, "task blocked for more than 120 seconds"
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:22:33PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:

> > These two look like the relevant ones to me but I'm not sure:
> > 22945e4a1c7454c97f5d8aee1ef526c83fef3223 svc: Clean up deferred requests on transport destruction
> > 69b6ba3712b796a66595cfaf0a5ab4dfe1cf964a SUNRPC: Ensure the server closes sockets in a timely fashion
> >
> > I think 69b6 was in the set of three I tested previously and the other
> > two turned into 2294?
> Yep, exactly.--b.

OK, I have patched my 2.6.26 kernel with these and it is now running.
It'll be about a week before I can say with any certainty that the issue
hasn't recurred.

Ian Campbell
Current Noise: Pitchshifter - Subject To Status

Do I have a lifestyle yet?

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-12 10:49    [W:0.089 / U:11.180 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site