Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:14:49 +0200 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: Does CONFIG_PARAVIRT imply usage of byte locks? |
| |
Jiri Kosina wrote: > Avi, are there any plans to make KVM use byte locks implementation for > spinlocks in the near future? >
No, although I note anything coming out of the spinning mutex discussion could be applied towards a sleeping spinlock for paravirt.
-- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.
| |