lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jan]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Does CONFIG_PARAVIRT imply usage of byte locks?
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Avi, are there any plans to make KVM use byte locks implementation for
> spinlocks in the near future?
>

No, although I note anything coming out of the spinning mutex discussion
could be applied towards a sleeping spinlock for paravirt.

--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-01-12 08:17    [W:0.157 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site