Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:18:06 -0800 | Subject | Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans | From | Ying Han <> |
| |
Thank you Valdis for your work and that is a really good news. :-)
--Ying
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 8:18 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:18:34 PST, Ying Han said: >> Hi Valdis: >> Please try this fix and i tested on ubunbu8.10 with xmms and it helps. > > Sorry for the long delay in testing, I was offline Wed-Friday taking some > much-needed leave time. > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c >> index 9e268b6..f4bbd9b 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > > This didn't apply cleanly to a mmotm-0105 tree, but did apply cleanly > with the following 3 patches reverted and then this new patch applied. > > page_fault-retry-with-nopage_retry.patch > page_fault-retry-with-nopage_retry-fix.patch > page_fault-retry-with-nopage_retry-fix-fix.patch > > not surprising, since it looks like this patch is a replacement for all 3. It > built and booted nicely, and xmms on the resulting kernel behaves properly. > > Congrats on being able to debug the problem based on my fairly weird bug > report. ;) >
| |