[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86: Add "virt flags"
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> hm, i think extending the already existing flags category sounds like
>> a better solution than the separate virtual CPU flags line in
>> /proc/cpuinfo. We already have self-invented flag entries (such as
>> X86_FEATURE_NOPL), and adding more for virtualization would be quite
>> natural to do, as long as it's reasonably close to the meaning of a
>> 'CPU feature'.
>> Peter, what would be your preference?
> It probably makes sense to separate these out as a separate word,
> especially if they come from the hardware in any reasonable way. But
> yes, adding them to the feature array makes sense.

Just to clarify:

I'm suggesting adding these to the existing feature flags array, in a
separate binary word.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-08 19:21    [W:0.137 / U:1.428 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site