[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] x86: Add "virt flags"
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> hm, i think extending the already existing flags category sounds like a
> better solution than the separate virtual CPU flags line in
> /proc/cpuinfo. We already have self-invented flag entries (such as
> X86_FEATURE_NOPL), and adding more for virtualization would be quite
> natural to do, as long as it's reasonably close to the meaning of a 'CPU
> feature'.
> Peter, what would be your preference?

It probably makes sense to separate these out as a separate word,
especially if they come from the hardware in any reasonable way. But
yes, adding them to the feature array makes sense.


 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-08 17:33    [W:0.100 / U:10.668 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site