Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sat, 6 Sep 2008 22:37:59 +0200 (CEST) | | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC patch 0/4] TSC calibration improvements | |
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Sep 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > Adding another check after the second get_cycles() makes it reliable:
>
> My original patch actually had that, and Ingo added it to the -tip tree
> too (I think), so that should be the one we're discussing anyway. I just
> didn't think it would ever trigger in practice, which is why I removed it.
> Mea culpa.
My bad. Did not test that against -tip, just applied it from mail :)
Just checked. The -tip version still has the expect-- in the for()
which might lead to stupid results depending on the gcc madness level.
Thanks,
tglx
|  |