lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: frame unwinder patches
    On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:19:21 +0200
    Bernd Schubert <bs@q-leap.de> wrote:

    > > not printing the ? would be trivial (for some backtraces we do
    > > that), but so far hasn't been seen as desirable because you lose
    > > information in those hard-to-debug cases when you need anything you
    > > can get from the backtrace.
    >
    > I see your point, but in most cases it is rather annoying.

    ... if you see backtraces regularly there's something wrong ;-)

    (and if you really care it's 1 line of code to turn it off)


    --
    If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
    For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
    visit http://www.lesswatts.org


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-09-05 15:35    [W:0.041 / U:29.664 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site