Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Sep 2008 06:33:17 -0700 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: frame unwinder patches |
| |
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:19:21 +0200 Bernd Schubert <bs@q-leap.de> wrote:
> > not printing the ? would be trivial (for some backtraces we do > > that), but so far hasn't been seen as desirable because you lose > > information in those hard-to-debug cases when you need anything you > > can get from the backtrace. > > I see your point, but in most cases it is rather annoying.
... if you see backtraces regularly there's something wrong ;-)
(and if you really care it's 1 line of code to turn it off)
-- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org
| |