lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: frame unwinder patches
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:19:21 +0200
Bernd Schubert <bs@q-leap.de> wrote:

> > not printing the ? would be trivial (for some backtraces we do
> > that), but so far hasn't been seen as desirable because you lose
> > information in those hard-to-debug cases when you need anything you
> > can get from the backtrace.
>
> I see your point, but in most cases it is rather annoying.

... if you see backtraces regularly there's something wrong ;-)

(and if you really care it's 1 line of code to turn it off)


--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-05 15:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site