lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [GIT]: Networking
    Date
    On Thursday, 4 of September 2008, David Miller wrote:
    > From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    > Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:24:16 -0700 (PDT)
    >
    > > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    > > >
    > > > What's so hard to understand about this?
    > >
    > > Here's a simple rule of thumb:
    > > - if it's not on the regression list
    > > - if it's not a reported security hole
    > > - if it's not on the reported oopses list
    > > then why are people sending it to me?
    > >
    > > IOW, if it's just another random improvement, and you send it to me
    > > outside of the merge window, then what is the point of the merge window?
    >
    > This is exactly what I've been trying to tell the Intel wireless folks
    > but they refuse to listen.
    >
    > I just won't take their stuff until they get their act in gear.
    >
    > No problem.

    BTW, there are two regression fixes for forcedeth:

    http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121894389018584&w=4
    http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121917167232014&w=4

    that fix the regressions tracked as:

    http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11358
    http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11361

    respectively and both are more than 2 weeks old now.

    Is there any chance to push them upstream or is there anything wrong with them?

    Thanks,
    Rafael


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-09-04 10:25    [W:0.021 / U:66.156 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site