![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:01:46 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote: > Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> writes: > > > Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch > > This just means that the root kits will switch to patch > the first instruction of the entry points instead. > > So the protection will be zero to minimal, but the overhead will > be there forever. > > Now that I said this I expect it to go in yesterday. > I'd have considered taking your email serious if you had left out the uncalled and unneeded sarcasm line at the end. -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-09-04 14:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||