Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Sep 2008 13:43:49 -0600 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: USBIP protocol |
| |
On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:57:06AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > I have no experience with isosynchronous transactions, nor interrupt > > transactions, so I decline to define them at this moment. > > Both of those are necessary, so you are going to have to define them > (mice/keyboards use interrupt and audio uses iso, so it is very common, > and easy to test for.)
I don't think I have any usb audio devices. Do you have any spares I could borrow from you at Kernel Summit?
> > I've given up on the big/little endian thing. Network protocols are > > traditionally BE, USB is LE and it can encapsulate SCSI which is BE again. > > What do you mean, you are just going to stick with BE?
I'm just going to use BE in the protocol, even though it's encapsulating a LE protocol.
-- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."
| |