Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 1/6] kmsg: tagged kernel messages. | From | Martin Schwidefsky <> | Date | Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:16:40 +0200 |
| |
On Sat, 2008-09-27 at 17:15 +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > These are just the regular printk levels. If your old printk used a > > particular level, have the kmsg_xxx printk use the same level. The > > question about message severity and message documenation are > > independent, aren't they? > > Yes, but since it's a new message API, I thought you might have an idea. It's > hard for authors (eg. me) to know which level to use. As a result, levels > currently seem to be chosen randomly. > > If you felt inspired to rationalize them, it would let us clean that up as > things moved to kmsg :)
Urgs, you are after a sort of definition what the differences is between a warning, an error, an alert, etc is, aren't you?
-- blue skies, Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
| |