Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:28:17 -0400 (EDT) | From | Steven Rostedt <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6] Unified trace buffer |
| |
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > But at least as long as it's static, it's probably not _too_ noticeable if > > the rest of the names don't overlap. We _do_ include <linux/rbtree.h> > > almost everywhere, since we use those things in the VM, in timers etc, so > > it comes in through pretty much all headers. > > Well, I just compiled it and it didn't have any name collisions, but that > doesn't mean that this wont change in the future.
For kicks I just added #include <linux/rbtree.h> and it still passed. I don't think we'll be adding new functions to rbtree.h, so it may be fine to stay with the rb_ prefix.
-- Steve
| |