![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:30 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote: > Thank you for your kind comments. > > Yes that's I concerned it breaks the other NAND ABI. Actually In > OneNAND it doesn't use eccpos since OneNAND controller handle all ECC > functions. we don't need to concern it. Right. > As pages are bigger, it requires more eccpos and other fields are > similar. we need more flexible filed definitions. Right. > Well how do you think that at this time it only describes the 64 bytes > only for temporarily and next time it adds remaining parts if it is > really needed. Well, it is not very nice, but I guess it should be OK for this case, because people are not supposed to look at OOB of MLC OneNAND anyway. So I would go this way, although I'm not sure dwmw2 would agree on this. -- Best regards, Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2008-09-26 08:29 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||