Messages in this thread - First message in thread
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- Chris Snook
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- "Brandeburg, Jesse"
- Jiri Kosina
- Karsten Keil
- "Jesse Brandeburg"
- Karsten Keil
- James Courtier-Dutton
|  | | | Date | Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:04:46 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) | | From | "Brandeburg, Jesse" <> | | Subject | Re: e1000e NVM corruption issue status |
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Chris Snook wrote:
> Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> > hardware affected:
> > laptops and desktops with 82566 or 82567 based LAN parts, which are machines
> > with the ICH8 and ICH9 chipsets and a variety of processors.
> > The machines I know of that have reported the issue include
> > Lenovo X300
> > HP 2510p
> > Intel DP35JO
> > Lenovo T61 (possibly)
> > Lenovo X61 (possibly)
>
> My Intel DG45ID board has an ICH10R chipset, and it also has an 82567LM, just
> as some of the affected systems. Is there some reason why ICH10 is not
> susceptible, or have we simply not seen it?
ICH10R with 82567 is also susceptible, as far as I know at this point.
|  |