lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: How how latent should non-preemptive scheduling be?
Date
Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> I've been struggling to boot -tip/master - currently it blows up just
> after printing SLUB information saying:
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004
> IP: [<c0120078>] account_system_time+0x48/0x120
> *pde = 00000000
> Thread overran stack, or stack corrupted
> Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT

OK this BUG seems to have gone away in the past few hours.

Ingo when you were asking for the ftrace report I presume that would be
for a non preempt kernel (as a preemptive one only showed a very worst
latency of 19657 us in one exceptional case)?

--
Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-23 21:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site