Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:10:32 -0400 | | From | Masami Hiramatsu <> | | Subject | Re: Unified tracing buffer |
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> But, with that, with a global atomic counter, and the following trace:
> > cpu 0: trace_point_a> cpu 1: trace_point_c> cpu 0: trace_point_b> cpu 1: trace_point_d> > > Could the event a really come after event d, even though we already hit
> event b?
yes, if event c is an interrupt event :-).
cpu 0 cpu 1
hit event d
hit event a
log event a
irq event c
log event c
hit event b
log event b
log event d
so, I think if we really need to order events, we have to stop
irq right after hitting an event.
Anyway, in most case, I think it works, but as accurate as
synchronized-TSC if hardware supports it.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America) Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com
|  |