lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: PTE access rules & abstraction
FromBenjamin Herrenschmidt <>
DateTue, 23 Sep 2008 15:31:26 +1000
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 05:10 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> We are getting better slowly I think (eg. you note that set_pte_at is
> no longer used as a generic "do anything"), but I won't dispute that
> this whole area could use an overhaul; a document for all the rules,
> a single person or point of responsibility for those rules...

Can we nowadays -rely- on set_pte_at() never being called to overwrite
an already valid PTE ? I mean, it looks like the generic code doesn't do
it anymore but I wonder if it's reasonable to forbid that from coming
back ? That would allow me to remove some hacks in ppc64 and simplify
some upcoming ppc32 code.

Cheers,
Ben.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-23 07:35    [from the cache]
©2003-2008