[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] remove fullflush and nofullflush in IOMMU generic option
    On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 12:25:24AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
    > I'm not sure we can because he has a quite different opinion on this,
    > he thinks that the IOMMU parameters are unimportant and minor issue.

    Stop your personal attacks and come down. I've never said that iommu
    parameters are unimportant. The _move_ of the iommu=[no]fullflush to
    generic code is a minor issue in my opinion. For the user it changes
    nothing. There was an iommu=fullflush parameter before and now there is
    also an iommu=fullflush parameter. The only difference is that it now
    affects AMD IOMMU too.

    > I'm against adding new generic IOMMU parameters without serious
    > consideration. Joerg thinks that we can clean up the parameters like
    > adding some for 2.6.28, then add some for 2.6.X, then rename some, in
    > an ad-hoc way.

    Again. Stop your personal attacks.


    | AMD Saxony Limited Liability Company & Co. KG
    Operating | Wilschdorfer Landstr. 101, 01109 Dresden, Germany
    System | Register Court Dresden: HRA 4896
    Research | General Partner authorized to represent:
    Center | AMD Saxony LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, US)
    | General Manager of AMD Saxony LLC: Dr. Hans-R. Deppe, Thomas McCoy

     \ /
      Last update: 2008-09-22 18:25    [W:0.022 / U:1.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site