lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Mark IPW2100 as BROKEN: Fatal interrupt. Scheduling firmware restart.
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 22:28:38 +0400
> Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:04:22AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven
>> (arjan@infradead.org) wrote:
>>> so now you go from an occasional burp to having nothing at all.
>>> How about you run with this patch on your own machine only?
>> And how else user can get attention to the problem which is not fixed
>> by the vendor?
>
> ... or the community
>
>> We close our eyes and there is no problem, since we do
>> not see it. I just brought a lamp: no user can see that essentially
>> driver is broken so he can run it on his own risk.
>>
>>> or.. since you say a reload of the driver fixes it.. why don't you
>>> make a patch for the driver that does basically the actions of a
>>> reload automatically when the driver detects the issue?
>>> (and stick a WARN_ON in for good measure so that kerneloops.org can
>>> start tracking these burps)
>> It stops after several seconds (or packets?). Sometimes (but rarely)
>> it works several minutes, sometimes it fires above dmesg line and
>> continues to work, sometimes it fires it for a while and then stops
>> writing it, although driver does not send or receive anything (at
>> least ifconfig counters do not change).
>
> again.. so how about you detect this condition and do, in the driver
> code, the equivalent of rmmod/insmod to the hardware. I'm sure people
> who have the hardware would appreciate that type of patch a lot more
> than the one you sent out.
>

I guess it is your way of "middle finger" to all the IPW2100 customers who try
to use it on a Linux machine.


Thanks
Wei




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-21 21:03    [W:0.166 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site