Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:09:37 +0900 | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | | Subject | Re: Unified tracing buffer |
| |
> > > CONTROL > > > ------- > > > > > > Sysfs style tree under debugfs > > > > > > /debugfs/tracing/<name>/buffers/enabed <--- binary value > > > > > > /debugfs/tracing/<name>/<event1> > > > /debugfs/tracing/<name>/<event2> > > > etc ... > > > > I wonder if we should make this another sub dir: > > > > /debugfs/tracing/buffers/events/<event-name> > > > > Sure. > > If needed, we could change the markers to take two separate parameters : > > trace_mark(tracer_name, event_name, "format", args)
Sorry, disagreed.
I believe any marker point should be independent to tracer. Otherwise, number of trace_mark() will blow up easily.
|  |