lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateMon, 22 Sep 2008 12:09:37 +0900
FromKOSAKI Motohiro <>
SubjectRe: Unified tracing buffer
> > > CONTROL
> > > -------
> > >
> > > Sysfs style tree under debugfs
> > >
> > > /debugfs/tracing/<name>/buffers/enabed <--- binary value
> > >
> > > /debugfs/tracing/<name>/<event1>
> > > /debugfs/tracing/<name>/<event2>
> > > etc ...
> >
> > I wonder if we should make this another sub dir:
> >
> > /debugfs/tracing/buffers/events/<event-name>
> >
>
> Sure.
>
> If needed, we could change the markers to take two separate parameters :
>
> trace_mark(tracer_name, event_name, "format", args)

Sorry, disagreed.

I believe any marker point should be independent to tracer.
Otherwise, number of trace_mark() will blow up easily.





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-09-22 05:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2010