lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2]: Remote softirq invocation infrastructure.
    On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 08:29:21 -0700
    >
    > > Jen's, as stated, has block layer uses for this. I intend to use
    > > this for receive side flow seperation on non-multiqueue network
    > > cards. And Steffen Klassert has a set of IPSEC parallelization
    > > changes that can very likely make use of this.
    >
    > What's the benefit that you (or Jens) sees from migrating softirqs
    > from specific cpu's to others?

    it means you do all the processing on the CPU that submitted the IO in
    the first place, and likely still has the various metadata pieces in
    its CPU cache (or at least you know you won't need to bounce them over)

    --
    Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
    For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
    visit http://www.lesswatts.org


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2008-09-20 17:47    [W:0.020 / U:241.568 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site