Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:22:13 +0800 | From | "Eric Miao" <> | Subject | Re: kernel.h: add ARRAY_AND_SIZE() macro to complement ARRAY_SIZE(). |
| |
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote: > [Eric Miao - Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 02:38:21AM +0800] > | On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote: > | > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:24:47PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > | >> Move the ARRAY_AND_SIZE() macro from arch/arm/mach-pxa/generic.h > | >> to a more useful position in include/linux/kernel.h. This macro > | >> is very useful to registration functions that take an array and > | >> the number of array elements in it as consecutive arguments. > | >> > | >> The macro also should ensure that mistakes where the wrong array > | >> is used to the ARRAY_SIZE() macro is passed. It also makes it > | >> easier to avoid wrapping registration function arguments. > | > > | >> --- linux-2.6.27-rc6-quilt4.orig/include/linux/kernel.h > | >> +++ linux-2.6.27-rc6-quilt4/include/linux/kernel.h > | >> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ extern const char linux_proc_banner[]; > | >> #define IS_ALIGNED(x, a) (((x) & ((typeof(x))(a) - 1)) == 0) > | >> > | >> #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr)) > | >> +#define ARRAY_AND_SIZE(arr) (arr), ARRAY_SIZE(arr) > | > > | > Just like ARRAY_SIZE, it is misnamed. > | > > | > | Any hint about the correct spelling? > | > | > And it isn't obvious to what it expands. Hopefully arm people will > | > remove it. :-) > | > | This is handy to use, saving several key strokes and making the line > | shorter. If it's not obvious to what it expands, there must be some > | fix for it? > | > > well, it seems it's not that good to use ARRAY_AND_SIZE at all. > Yes it's short but quite frankly - hiding number of args is not > that good. > > example > > static void ssp_send_cmd(uint32_t *cmd, int num); > > called as > > ssp_send_cmd(ARRAY_AND_SIZE(lcd_panel_on)); > > thanks it's not that spreaded across kernel. > Someday it could lead to ARRAY_AND_SIZE_CHECK_IF_EXIST_AND_PANIC :)
Probably that not gonna happen.
without ARRAY_AND_SIZE:
ssp_send_cmd(lcd_panel_on, ARRAY_SIZE(lcd_panel_on));
with:
ssp_send_cmd(ARRAY_AND_SIZE(lcd_panel_on));
where you don't have to repeat the array name. I have to admit that a macro expanding to something like an argument list instead of a single variable or something is not a good idea. But, we are using C, and there's no easy way just to pass the array itself, otherwise one may come up with:
ssp_send_cmd(lcd_panel_on);
ssp_send_cmd(array a) { int size = a.length();
........ }
I'm not trying to buy anyone anything, just illustrate this, and see if anyone else is interested in doing so.
| |